This week we conducted the National Geographic Geography Bee. Starting in 4th-6th grade classrooms, students were asked random questions about geography- which can cover both physical and cultural topics.  Those students who answered 6 out 7 questions correctly qualified for the Final round.   Over 21 students qualified and met in the multi at lunch to answer more questions.  This process continued until we narrowed down our two finalists to compete in today’s Championship round (stay tuned for our winner).

There are couple of points I want to make here.  First, I invited any student who wished to watch the Final round to come to the multi.  I was so pleased to see so many students, from every grade level, show up to support their school mates.  The student interest was high and they really did cheer on every contestant.  It was great to see that Springer spirit!

Secondly, I found myself in conflict with the format of this competition.  While our finalists proved their interest and passion in geography, I worry that those students who didn’t qualify might not consider themselves good geographers.  Even worse, I fear that if a student didn’t qualify, he or she might be turned off by the subject of geography.  The Geography Bee format really plays to the strengths of students who have a strong visual/spatial sense of the world (since students aren’t allowed to refer to a map to answer the questions).  We know that humans have strengths and challenges in all types of thinking; whether it be visual processing, auditory processing, spatial sense, memory, etc.  Anyone can be a good geographer by using all types of thinking, so a competition that utilizes a specific type of thinking should never be a measure of the true interest and passion of a subject.  I feel the same way about spelling bees; just because someone isn’t strong at spelling words orally doesn’t mean they aren’t good spellers! (I happen to be one of those people)

It’s our job as parents and educators to help children understand that such competitions are not a genuine indicator of interest or potential.  Because a student cannot rip through a math facts page at rapid speed is in no way an indication of a poor math student.  Just because a person isn’t the fastest runner doesn’t mean they cannot be a great soccer player.  There is a potential danger in celebrating an enhanced skill if we don’t also acknowledge the many other traits that make up the whole.  

If this reads to you like another plug for growth mindset- well, it is. It’s also a call for all of us to honor all types of efforts and thinking towards achieving a passion for learning- in any area.

Thank you for being a wonderful community.

Wade Spenader- Principal